On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> wrote:
> On 22May2018 0741, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> ISTR there are plenty of PEPs that never get posted to python-ideas >> because they are discussed on a separate list. >> > > There are often better venues for the initial discussion (such as > security-sig, distutils-sig or datetime-sig), but I think that's orthogonal > from posting the full text of a PEP. > I don't think that the original rationale for posting the full text of a PEP to a mailing list still applies. The raw text is on GitHub in the python/peps repo, and the formatted text is on python.org. We're not some kind of bureaucratic org that pretends to still live in the world of paper and pencil. > That said, if the aim is to keep discussion in another place (such as > github), you really don't want copies floating around any other mailing > lists. Eventually I'd hope it comes through for final review though, as I'm > sure a number of us are unlikely to click through to github unless we have > a specific interest in the topic. > IMO if you can't be bothered to click through on GitHub you forfeit your right to comment. (Which isn't a right anyway, it's a privilege.) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
