M J Fleming wrote: > +1 > > I definately agree with the 0c664 octal literal. Seems rather more > intuitive.
And importantly, sounds like "Oc" 664 ;) Tim Delaney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
