On 2/5/2019 11:44 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I cannot comment on the PR, but since the functionality is
asyncio-specific, I would suggest moving it to a dedicate
`asyncio.testing` module, or something similar, rather than leaving it
in `unittest` proper.
That is one of the options discussed on the issue.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 07:05:05 -0500
David Shawley <daveshaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone, I added a PR to add a sub-class of unittest.TestCase that makes it
possible to write async test methods. I wrote this a few months ago and it is
waiting on core review. Is there a core dev that can take up this review? I
would love to have this functionality in the core.
Lukasz - should we add this to Python 3.8 or is it too late for feature
additions?
Features can be added until beta1, and until that, additions are not the
release manager decision.
BPO link: https://bugs.python.org/issue32972
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32972>
Github PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10296
<https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10296>
All or most of the relevant people are nosy on the issue. So a reminder
there would be appropriate. However, from my cursory scan, it is not
clear if the 5 core devs involved (marked by blue and yellow snakes)
agree on exactly what more should be added. Perhaps you should
summarize what you think there is and is not agreement on.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
