On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019 13:46:34 CEST Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 21/05/2019 13.08, André Malo wrote:
> > On Montag, 20. Mai 2019 23:27:49 CEST Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >> NNTP is still quite used (often through GMane, but probably not only)
> >> so
> >> I'd question the removal of nntplib.
> >>
> >> cgitb used to be used by some Web frameworks in order to format
> >> exceptions. Perhaps one should check if that's still the case.
> >
> > I concur with both of those.
> > There's software in production using both. (It doesn't mean it's on pypi
> > or even free software).
>
> There is always somebody who uses a feature. This argument blocks any
> innovation or cleanup. Victor just reminded me of https://xkcd.com/1172/
> .
>
> * The removed modules will be available through PyPI.
> * You don't have to start to worry until Python 3.10 is released in over 3
> years from now. * The modules are fully supported in Python 3.8 and 3.9.
> Python 3.9 will reach EOL late 2026 or early 2027.
Correct. However that's a valid argument for the whole stdlib.
I agree with Victor (in the other branch), that we should call the PEP how
it's meant.
It effectively boils down to: "We don't want to maintain these modules
anymore, volunteers step forward within the next 3 years". It would
definitely draw a clear line and cut short a lot of discussions (like this
one).
And it would be perfectly fine, for me at least.
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =>__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
