On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:18 PM Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
> I'm personally viewing it as a first step in addressing the maintenance 
> burden we have with such a large stdlib. Christian started this work over a 
> year ago and I think it's worth seeing through. After that we should probably 
> have a discussion as a team about how we view the stdlib long-term and how 
> that ties into maintaining it so that people's opinion of the stdlib's 
> quality goes up rather than viewing the quality of it as varying 
> module-to-module.

I started a thread on discourse to discuss some "what if" scenarios
here, in the hopes it will help us make more informed decisions:
https://discuss.python.org/t/1738

-n

-- 
Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to