On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:18 PM Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > I'm personally viewing it as a first step in addressing the maintenance > burden we have with such a large stdlib. Christian started this work over a > year ago and I think it's worth seeing through. After that we should probably > have a discussion as a team about how we view the stdlib long-term and how > that ties into maintaining it so that people's opinion of the stdlib's > quality goes up rather than viewing the quality of it as varying > module-to-module.
I started a thread on discourse to discuss some "what if" scenarios here, in the hopes it will help us make more informed decisions: https://discuss.python.org/t/1738 -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com