On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:19:52 +0900 Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 5:49 AM Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > > > > > For the record, there's another contender in the allocator > > competition now: > > https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc/ > > > > Regards > > > > Antoine. > > It's a very strong competitor! > > $ ./python -m pyperf compare_to pymalloc.json mimalloc.json -G --min-speed=3 > Faster (14): > - spectral_norm: 202 ms +- 5 ms -> 176 ms +- 3 ms: 1.15x faster (-13%) > - unpickle: 19.7 us +- 1.9 us -> 17.6 us +- 1.3 us: 1.12x faster (-11%) > - json_dumps: 17.1 ms +- 0.2 ms -> 15.7 ms +- 0.2 ms: 1.09x faster (-8%) > - json_loads: 39.0 us +- 2.6 us -> 36.2 us +- 1.1 us: 1.08x faster (-7%) > - crypto_pyaes: 162 ms +- 1 ms -> 150 ms +- 1 ms: 1.08x faster (-7%) > - regex_effbot: 3.62 ms +- 0.04 ms -> 3.38 ms +- 0.01 ms: 1.07x faster (-7%) > - pickle_pure_python: 689 us +- 53 us -> 650 us +- 5 us: 1.06x faster (-6%) > - scimark_fft: 502 ms +- 2 ms -> 478 ms +- 2 ms: 1.05x faster (-5%) > - float: 156 ms +- 2 ms -> 149 ms +- 1 ms: 1.05x faster (-5%) > - pathlib: 29.0 ms +- 0.5 ms -> 27.7 ms +- 0.4 ms: 1.05x faster (-4%) > - mako: 22.4 ms +- 0.1 ms -> 21.6 ms +- 0.2 ms: 1.04x faster (-4%) > - scimark_sparse_mat_mult: 6.21 ms +- 0.04 ms -> 5.99 ms +- 0.08 ms: > 1.04x faster (-3%) > - xml_etree_parse: 179 ms +- 5 ms -> 173 ms +- 3 ms: 1.04x faster (-3%) > - sqlalchemy_imperative: 42.0 ms +- 0.9 ms -> 40.7 ms +- 0.9 ms: 1.03x > faster (-3%) > > Benchmark hidden because not significant (46): ... Ah, interesting. Were you able to measure the memory footprint as well? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/47NHQNPQVR6GPZ3PPRCAVZLPRXGV4GNW/
