On 5/1/20 9:19 AM, silverback...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope this isn't too noobish, nothing on the list comes up in Google,
but I'm curious why the construct
for x in y if x.is_some_thing:
# do a thing
But this is probably clearer (and has the same syntax):
for x in y:
if x.is_some_thing:
# do a thing
Cramming two separate thoughts onto a single line is probably *not* clearer.
isn't legal. That seems a very Pythonic symmetry with lambdas. The
equivalent syntax required right now is,
for x in [x for x in y if x.is_some_thing]:
# do a thing
Of course there's more flexibility in the full syntax, but is there
any interest in the simpler, more performant one-line syntax?
Em
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VHFUQFEF3TCI6LHLBAUEKMFM2A6V3CQO/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
--
Dr. Gary Herron
Professor of Computer Science
DigiPen Institute of Technology
(425) 895-4418
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/T3VQGGAHYR4AOKMVPL5NDTAV2GB6BIAH/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
