We seem to be, once again, rehashing about this.  For example, I proposed
this in 2017, which was not the first time:

https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-id...@python.org/thread/GFZFJAI4WGFYFFVQTF7DORHMY7F45XZZ/

(Gary's suggestion, and (counter) counter points to it are in the linked
discussion)

Would it maybe be time for someone to write a PEP for this (if they can be
found), so it can then be rejected (or not)?

I think there is no bikeshedding to be done on the idea, though in terms of
parsing there might be (though as I mentioned in that thread, there should
be no difference to generator expression parsing).

On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 19:52, Gary Herron <gher...@digipen.edu> wrote:

>
> On 5/1/20 9:19 AM, silverback...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I hope this isn't too noobish, nothing on the list comes up in Google, but
> I'm curious why the construct
>
> for x in y if x.is_some_thing:
>   # do a thing
>
> But this is probably clearer (and has the same syntax):
>
> for x in y:
>   if x.is_some_thing:
>     # do a thing
>
>
> Cramming two separate thoughts onto a single line is probably *not*
> clearer.
>
>
>
> isn't legal. That seems a very Pythonic symmetry with lambdas. The
> equivalent syntax required right now is,
>
> for x in [x for x in y if x.is_some_thing]:
>   # do a thing
>
> Of course there's more flexibility in the full syntax, but is there any
> interest in the simpler, more performant one-line syntax?
>
> Em
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 
> python-dev-leave@python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at 
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VHFUQFEF3TCI6LHLBAUEKMFM2A6V3CQO/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
> --
> Dr. Gary Herron
> Professor of Computer Science
> DigiPen Institute of Technology
> (425) 895-4418
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/T3VQGGAHYR4AOKMVPL5NDTAV2GB6BIAH/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/SBEKOAFBUNVFXR5UXCSFF6HPEE4GEE6O/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to