On 06/23/2020 09:01 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
PEP 622
Okay, I took Paul Moore's advice and went looking in existing code for some
examples, and came across the following:
if isinstance(v, int):
# v is an offset
elif isinstance(v, str):
# v is a docstring
elif isinstance(v, tuple) and len(v) in (2, 3) and isinstance(v[0],
baseinteger) and isinstance(v[1], (basestring, NoneType)):
# v is an offset, a docstring, and (maybe) a default
elif isinstance(v, tuple) and len(v) in (1, 2) and isinstance(v[0],
(basestring, NoneType)):
# v is a docstring and (maybe) a default
That seems like it would be a perfect match (hah) for the new syntax, but I am
not confident in my efforts.
This is what I started with:
match v: # goal here is to turn v into an (offset, docstring, default
value)
case int:
v = v, None, None
case str:
v = None, v, None
case (str, ):
# how to combine with above case?
v = None, v[0], None
case (int, str):
v += (None, )
case (int, str, default):
pass
case (str, default):
v = None, v[0], v[1]
Which got me to here:
match v: # goal here is to turn v into an (offset, docstring, default
value)
case int(offset):
v = offset, None, None
case str(doc) | (str(doc), ):
v = None, doc, None
case (int(offset), str(doc)):
v = offset, doc, None
case (int(offset), str(doc), default):
# already correct
pass
case (str(doc), default):
v = None, doc, default
Is this correct?
Side note: I would much rather read "case str(doc) or (str(doc), )" instead of
a |.
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/N6XLWOSRAVUF6MOOQFZTVQHXEWFRXTHY/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
