On 2/15/06, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/15/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I haven't been following the AST stuff closely enough, but I'm not crazy > > about putting access to this in the sys module. It seems like it > > clutters that up with a name that will be rarely used by the average > > Python programmer. > > Agreed. I'm hoping we can get rid of lots of code in the compiler > module and use the AST provided from C. The compiler module seems the > best place to put anything related to the AST. >
Sure, fine with me. I am not in love with the sys idea, just seemed reasonable. I just happen to think of the compiler module as this Python implementation of the bytecode compiler and not as this generic package where all compiler-related stuff goes. But if we move towards removing the parts of the compiler package that overlap with any AST being exposed that would be great. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
