Hi, IMO a new PEP would avoid confusion:
* The new PEP should list differences with the previously rejected PEP * The old PEP remains available unchanged to help to understand why it has been rejected It's common to have multiple PEP for the same feature. Once a PEP is accepted, other PEP are rejected or marked as "superseded" (by the accepted PEP). > One of the existing authors, Stefano Borini, is interested in updating > the PEP with a new strategy that has some support (but not a consensus) > on Python-Ideas, and removing from contention the previous strategies. Aha, interesting! Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/YWWPUYTZOSSFU4WCDHRK5IB4AVZZB366/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
