On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:20:08 +0200 Victor Stinner <vstin...@python.org> wrote: > Hi, > > IMO a new PEP would avoid confusion: > > * The new PEP should list differences with the previously rejected PEP > * The old PEP remains available unchanged to help to understand why it > has been rejected > > It's common to have multiple PEP for the same feature. Once a PEP is > accepted, other PEP are rejected or marked as "superseded" (by the > accepted PEP).
Agreed with Victor. Please create a new PEP. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/SK5Q76F3GZAF6BAEMCSYDVX35YINZSAW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
