On Aug 4, 2021, at 07:31, Victor Stinner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:54 PM Ethan Furman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would rather keep `bchr` and lose the `.fromint()` methods. > > I would prefer to only have a bytes.byte(65) method, no bchr() > built-in function. I would prefer to keep builtins namespace as small > as possible.
The Steering Council is also pretty adamantly against adding a new bchr() built-in. > bytes.byte() name is similar to bytes.getbyte(). I cannot find "int" > in the name of other bytes methods. .byte() seems fine to me too. I’m not a fan of smushedwords but .fromint() seemed better than .fromord(). -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/CPZTRWIWLRKTBHQS6UPY63BEZCV3FDZZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
