On 11/29/21 7:10 PM, Inada Naoki wrote:
Anyone against making a statement that "PEP 563 will never be the default behavior"?
I think only the SC is empowered to make such a statement.
Then, we do not need to decide "PEP 563 or 649". We can focus on whether we can replace "stock semantics + opt-in PEP 563" with PEP 649 or not.
I doubt the current status quo--keeping PEP 563 as optional behavior, permanently--is viable long-term. It causes problems for most runtime uses of annotations, which we were collectively basically ignoring until now. As runtime use of annotations /and/ typing both become more pervasive, these problems are only going to grow.
//arry/
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JHOJWKZZWW4TB6TS7GX26WERKAEAC7VH/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
