FWIW this has now been checked in. Enjoy! --Guido
On 2/23/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/22/06, Michael Chermside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A minor related point about on_missing(): > > > > Haven't we learned from regrets over the .next() method of iterators > > that all "magically" invoked methods should be named using the __xxx__ > > pattern? Shouldn't it be named __on_missing__() instead? > > Good point. I'll call it __missing__. I've uploaded a new patch to > python.org/sf/1433928. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
