On 2/27/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't mind seeing one of the early ideas from PEP 340 being resurrected > some day, such that the signature for the special method was "__next__(self, > input)" and for the builtin "next(iterator, input=None)" > > That would go hand in hand with the idea of allowing the continue statement to > accept an argument though.
Yup. The continue thing we might add in 2.6. The __next__ API in 3.0. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
