On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:34 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 16:29 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > > The story is different for PySet_Update(). Defining it now could get in > > the way > > of possible future development for the module (the function may end-up > > taking a > > variable length argument list instead of a single argument). > > So why not just go ahead and do that now? If you know that's what you > want eventually, why wait? From my perspective, adding a NULL at the > end of the argument list wouldn't be that big of a deal.
BTW, I'm willing to do the work on this. I'm already going to update my patch anyway to reflect our current decisions, so I'm happy to do this while I'm at it. I'll try to get a new patch posted in a day or so. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
