On 3/30/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/30/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > > I can ask them for a test py3k account, if there's any interest. > > > > I'm personally not very much interested in a Py3k tracker; I don't > > see myself using it. So I'm not interested in a trac-based one, > > either. > > Me neither. It's too early.
Same here. Please move any more comments about infrastructure to the infrastructure list (http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure/). But do realize the committee is not discussing trackers yet. We are still trying to get our SF data out so that can be imported into a tracker to test its use (we need large scale bugs in it to stress it and get a feel for its search abilities, etc.). I am going to be picky about keeping the intfrastructure email traffic focued on the task at hand. Tracker discussions will be mostly ignored by me until I send out the official call for tracker suggestions with volunteer maintainers. At that point we can figure out what trackers to consider and who will be in charge of getting the test setup going. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
