Tim Peters wrote: > The more realistically ;-) I try to picture the suggested > alternatives, the more sensible this one sounds. Some people at the > sprint (like me, wrt the Iceland sprint) could volunteer to be > responsible for checking checkins for appropriateness, and in any case > everyone subscribed to python-checkins would see what's going on. That's > a major goodness all by itself, for "more eyeballs" reasons. It should > be possible to quickly stop anyone abusing the privilege.
I completely agree. Just make sure you master the mechanics of adding committers. > However ... speaking as a PSF Director, I wouldn't be comfortable with > this unless sprinters signed a PSF contribution form beforehand. Else > we get code in the PSF repository with clear-as-mud copyright and > licensing issues. Having contribution forms in place would also ease > fears that sprint output might be "subverted" to non-open status. That would be desirable, indeed. It shouldn't be too difficult to collect the forms "on site". Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
