M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

> The results were produced by pybench 2.0 and use time.time
> on Linux, plus a different calibration strategy. As a result
> these timings are a lot more repeatable than with pybench 1.3
> and I've confirmed the timings using several runs to make sure.

can you check in 2.0 ?  (if it's not quite ready for public consumption, 
put it in the sandbox).

</F>

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to