On 7/5/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:18 AM 7/5/2006 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >I don't see anything else that's attractive. The realistic options are: > > > >1. do nothing > >2. extend global's meaning > >3. add outer keyword > > Did you also consider and reject: > > * Alternate binding operators (e.g. ":=", ".=", etc.)
Brr. > * Alternate spelling of outer names when binding (e.g. ".x = whatever" to > bind an outer x) We looked at and rejected "globals.x = whatever". I think the same reasoning applies here. > If so, then these should probably be added to the "rejected alternatives" > for Py3K so they don't get rehashed. Georgbot? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
