Jim Jewett schrieb: > Either > > x**= n % 10 # The **= changes the parse context, so that % > is no longer > # immediately evaluated
Are you seriously proposing such a change? I was asking for spellings that currently don't have a meaning (rather, I was suggesting that no such spelling exists, and the entire idea of supporting such notation in the language is ridiculous). > x**= (n, 10) # exponentiation to a tuple isn't currently > defined, and it Likewise: it currenly is well-defined: it invoked nb_inplace_power with the tuple (and __ipow__ if x's class is written in Python). Whether this gives a TypeError or not depends on the class of x. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
