Alan Kennedy wrote: > Sorry, my mistake.
No problem. > So, a question I would ask is: Is "connect" the right name for that function? > ... > Perhaps a better name might be "create_connected_client_socket", or > something equally descriptive? Guido proposed "connect_with_timeout". I don't like your proposal, neither Guido's. But, I recognize that maybe it's not the best name. What about "create_connection"? > Another question I would ask is: "How do I ensure that my newly > created connected client socket is in blocking mode, *without* making > any assumptions about the value of socket.getdefaulttimeout()?" Call like this: newsock = socket.connect((..., ...)) newsock.setblocking(1) Remember that this function is to replace the same code in N other places, and in any of other places I saw this usage. Regards, -- . Facundo . Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
