Josiah Carlson wrote: > restrict what the user could pass as a value to timeout. It requires > that you pass timeout explicitly, but that's a (relatively > inconsequential) API decision.
This is exactly the point. It's an API decision, that you must communicate to the user, he/she must read it and remember it. Letting "timeout" be positional or named, it's just less error prone. So, if I can make it this way, it's what I prefer, :) Regards, -- . Facundo . Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
