On 7/5/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:53 AM 7/5/2007 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >I see no big problems with this, except I wonder if in the end it > >wouldn't be better to *always* define __package_name__ instead of only > >when it's in main? And then perhaps rename it to __package__? Done > >properly it could always be used for relative imports, rather than > >parsing __module__ to find the package. Then you won't even need the > >error handler. > > +1 for __package__, and putting it everywhere. Relative import > should use it first if present, falling back to use of __name__.
+1 from me as well. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
