"Brett Cannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/5/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 11:53 AM 7/5/2007 +0200, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > >I see no big problems with this, except I wonder if in the end it > > >wouldn't be better to *always* define __package_name__ instead of only > > >when it's in main? And then perhaps rename it to __package__? Done > > >properly it could always be used for relative imports, rather than > > >parsing __module__ to find the package. Then you won't even need the > > >error handler. > > > > +1 for __package__, and putting it everywhere. Relative import > > should use it first if present, falling back to use of __name__. > > +1 from me as well.
This would solve some issues I'm currently having with relative imports. +1 - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
