-1. Looks like more magic, not less, to me. On 11/1/07, Tony Lownds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This is a minor nit, as with all decorators that take an argument, > > it seems like it sets up a hard-to-debug error condition if you were > > to accidentally forget it: > > > > @property > > def foo(): ... > > @property.set > > def foo(): ... > > > > would leave you with 'foo' pointing at something that wasn't a > > descriptor at all. Is there a way to make that more debuggable? > > How about this: give the property instance a method that changes a > property from read-only to read-write. > No parens, no frame magic. As a small bonus, the setter function would > not have to be named the same as the > property. > > class A(object): > @property > def foo(self): > return 1 > > @foo.setter > def set_foo(self, value): > print 'set:', value > > -Tony > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
