Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fred Drake wrote:
>> @property
>> def attribute(self):
>> return 42
>>
>> @property.set
>> def attribute(self, value):
>> self._ignored = value
>
> Hmmm... if you were allowed general lvalues as the target of a
> def, you could write that as
>
> def attribute.set(self, value):
> ...
>
Dotted names would be sufficient rather than general lvalues.
I like this, I think it looks cleaner than the other options, especially if
you write both getter and setter in the same style:
attribute = property()
def attribute.fget(self):
return 42
def attribute.fset(self, value):
self._ignored = value
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
