On 16/11/2007, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gustavo Carneiro wrote: > > I am finding myself often doing for loops over a subset of a list, like: > > > > for r in results: > > if r.numNodes != numNodes: > > continue > > # do something with r > > > > It would be nice if the plain for loop was as flexible as list > comprehensions > > and allowed an optional if clause, like this: > > > > for r in results if r.numNodes == numNodes: > > # do something with r > > You can do the same today, sans sugar: > > for r in (s for s in results if s.numNodes == numNodes): > # do something with r
Yes, I can do that, as well as I can use the 'continue' statement, but both versions are slightly more verbose and less clear than what I propose. -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
