Martin v. Löwis wrote: > when some caller of PyEval_EvalFrameEx still carries > a pointer to some object that got deleted, and then still some code can > get hold of the then-deleted object.
I seem to have missed the beginning of this discussion. I don't see what the problem is here. If a caller needs a pointer to an object, shouldn't it be holding a counted reference to it? -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
