On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >> One issue to consider is also politeness. People sometimes complain that > >> they feel treated unfair if their report is declared "invalid" - they > >> surely believed it was a valid report, at the time they made it. > > > > I agree with Martin for both of these - 'works for me' and 'out of date' > > convey additional information to the originator of the bug, even if they > > don't make a signifcant difference from a development point of view. > > The term 'works for me' can be confused with 'solution/patch works for me'. > I've generally seen the phrase 'works for me' to mean agreement of a > proposed action of some sort. > > Maybe something along the lines of 'can not reproduce' would be better?
I have to agree with Ron. I honestly thought "works for me" meant the solution worked. Something less ambiguous would be nice. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
