Ron Adam wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> >>> One issue to consider is also politeness. People sometimes complain that >>> they feel treated unfair if their report is declared "invalid" - they >>> surely believed it was a valid report, at the time they made it. >>> >> I agree with Martin for both of these - 'works for me' and 'out of date' >> convey additional information to the originator of the bug, even if they >> don't make a signifcant difference from a development point of view. >> > > The term 'works for me' can be confused with 'solution/patch works for me'. > I've generally seen the phrase 'works for me' to mean agreement of a > proposed action of some sort. > > Maybe something along the lines of 'can not reproduce' would be better? > > +1 for 'can not reproduce' or perhaps 'can not duplicate'
# Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
