"Joost Behrends" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | With such a tuple tp i tried 'ix = tp.index(...)' recently and was | astonished to learn, that this doesn't work. Since we have '... in tp' | for me it seems, that it should make very little difference in | the interpreter's code, if .index() would be a method of any sequence, | mutable or not. Such a small difference, that this minor change wouldn't | deserve a PEP.
I believe .index() is part of the 3.0 sequence protocol and hence has been added to tuples for 3.0. Don't know if has been or will be backported to 2.6. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
