Terry Reedy wrote: > "Joost Behrends" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | With such a tuple tp i tried 'ix = tp.index(...)' recently and was > | astonished to learn, that this doesn't work. Since we have '... in tp' > | for me it seems, that it should make very little difference in > | the interpreter's code, if .index() would be a method of any sequence, > | mutable or not. Such a small difference, that this minor change wouldn't > | deserve a PEP. > > I believe .index() is part of the 3.0 sequence protocol and hence has been > added to tuples for 3.0. Don't know if has been or will be backported to > 2.6.
Python 2.6a1+ (trunk:61289M, Mar 7 2008, 19:45:46) [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> 'index' in dir(tuple) True Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com