"Martin v. Löwis" writes: > > > > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"? > > > > > Isn't that bikeshedding? > > > > No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate, > > and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea, > > implemented", from somebody already looking at that code. > > It's already committed, so one would have to go back and change it.
Now, *you* are bikeshedding. I know that it was committed, so I politely made the suggestion, half-expecting it to get dropped on the floor. If so, no great loss, and I wouldn't have followed up (except maybe with a patch on the tracker). Is that discouraged on this list? (That's a real question.) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
