-On [20080413 19:59], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Making suggestions on the list, and then following up with patch,
>is certainly encouraged, and happens all the time.
Here you go.
>I just think that *this* specific proposed change is more effort to
>talk about than it's worth.
So I wonder why it couldn't have been changed then instead of spending
another email on the subject. :P <tongue firmly planted in cheek>
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
Without you, I am nothing...
Index: Python/getopt.c
===================================================================
--- Python/getopt.c (revision 62327)
+++ Python/getopt.c (working copy)
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
if (option == 'X') {
fprintf(stderr,
- "-X is reserved for non-standard arguments\n");
+ "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments\n");
return '_';
}
Index: Modules/main.c
===================================================================
--- Modules/main.c (revision 62327)
+++ Modules/main.c (working copy)
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@
skipfirstline = 1;
break;
- /* case 'X': reserved for non-standard arguments */
+ /* case 'X': reserved for implementation-specific arguments */
case 'U':
Py_UnicodeFlag++;
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
