Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Personally, I would consider the following sufficient: >> >> 1) people who have authenticated themselves against the underlying VCS (i.e. >> project members) may post public comments and comment on other comments > > Tell me how to authenticate against a SVN project using HTTP only.
Good question. :) >> 2) anonymous users can post comments that won't become publicly visible >> until >> an authenticated user acknowledges them or comments on them. > > Can you work out this design more? I don't understand how an > authenticated user can acknowledge an anonymous comment if it isn't > publicly visible. I was suggesting that you'd sign in as a project member and would then see all comments. They just wouldn't show up on the public web sites without further action. I think that matches the normal work flow. External users usually do some kind of upstream talk anyway. It would be rare that no project member is involved in a patch contribution. And new contributions would go through the bug tracker first anway, right? > Also, AFAIK our bug tracker doesn't support > anonymous comments either, so I don't think this is an important use > case. >> That should be enough to keep the system open to everybody and to keep spam >> away. > > It's also more work to code. Sure, it's also just an idea from my side. Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com