On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Personally, I would consider the following sufficient: > > > > 1) people who have authenticated themselves against the underlying VCS > (i.e. > > project members) may post public comments and comment on other comments > > Tell me how to authenticate against a SVN project using HTTP only. > > > 2) anonymous users can post comments that won't become publicly visible > until > > an authenticated user acknowledges them or comments on them. > > Can you work out this design more? I don't understand how an > authenticated user can acknowledge an anonymous comment if it isn't > publicly visible. Also, AFAIK our bug tracker doesn't support > anonymous comments either, so I don't think this is an important use > case. > Rather than svn authentication i suggest just piggybacking on top of the bug trackers authentication. that is an integration i think we should aim for anyways and it should keep the no-google-account fear mongers happy. code comments (as bug comments are today) should not require svn commit access. anyways, i expect someone else may implement that once the code is out there. -gps
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
