And just to make my position perfectly clear, I've unassigned it, since I don't foresee to be able to give this issue the quality time it clearly needs. Mind you, I agree it's a release blocker. But I don't have time to personally investigate it. Sorry.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:54 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 04:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> an explanation about *why* Django cannot even be imported than a >>> blanket complaint that this is a disgrace. So why is it? > >> and already discussed: >> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078421.html > > Following that trail of breadcrumbs, I ended up here: > > http://bugs.python.org/issue2235 > > with a message from some guy named "Barry Warsaw" (anyone know him?) that > says: > > """ > Guido, can you comment on Amaury's latest patch? I'm going to bump this > back to critical so as not to hold up 2.6 alpha, but it should be marked > as a release blocker for the first beta. > """ > > I don't know if this "Barry" guy has the appropriate permissions on the > bugtracker to increase priorities, so I've taken the liberty of upgrading it > as a release blocker for the _second_ beta ... ;-). So, at least there's > been one productive consequence of this discussion. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com