Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Ralf Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you're saying py.test needs to be fixed? Fine with me, but then I
don't understand why you bothered bringing it up here instead of
fixing it (or reporting to the py.test maintainers, I don't know if
you're one or not).
no, I'm not. Just wanted to point out, that this ticket/patch does not
solve the django issue.
(this is what I first thought it would do).
I'm still missing details.
I'm going to spend some time looking into this this weekend (issue
assigned appropriately. Getting it working again shouldn't be too bad
(just revert the relevants bits to their 2.5 equivalents) - the tricky
part is going to be keeping the warning of the associated change to the
semantics in 3.0.
(I'll also take a look at 3.0 to make sure the relevant test case from
the tracker issue works properly there)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
