On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My apologies for hammering on this, but I think it is quite important and > currently Python 3.0 seems confused about UCS-2 versus UTF-16. [...]
Your seem to be suggesting that len(u"\U00012345") should return 1 on a system that internally uses UTF-16 and hence represents this string as a surrogate pair. This is not going to happen. You may as well complain to the authors of the Java standard about the corresponding problem there. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
