On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Given that in Python 3.0 __cmp__ is going away, I'm not sure how much >> it all matters -- but if you care, as long as it's supported at all, >> you might as well strive for the most compatibility with 2.5... > > Sure, it won't be a problem on Jython 3.0. But I'm doing this for the > upcoming Jython 2.5, where we still have to live with __cmp__
Which is why I recommend the closest possible compatibility. :-) > -- > Leo Soto M. > http://blog.leosoto.com > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com