On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Given that in Python 3.0 __cmp__ is going away, I'm not sure how much
>> it all matters -- but if you care, as long as it's supported at all,
>> you might as well strive for the most compatibility with 2.5...
>
> Sure, it won't be a problem on Jython 3.0. But I'm doing this for the
> upcoming Jython 2.5, where we still have to live with __cmp__

Which is why I recommend the closest possible compatibility. :-)

> --
> Leo Soto M.
> http://blog.leosoto.com
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to