On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Given that in Python 3.0 __cmp__ is going away, I'm not sure how much >>> it all matters -- but if you care, as long as it's supported at all, >>> you might as well strive for the most compatibility with 2.5... >> >> Sure, it won't be a problem on Jython 3.0. But I'm doing this for the >> upcoming Jython 2.5, where we still have to live with __cmp__ > > Which is why I recommend the closest possible compatibility. :-)
Oh, right :) But that's going to be easier if I understand the "why" and not only the "how". I can live with a "no idea why" answer, though. -- Leo Soto M. http://blog.leosoto.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
