<skip <at> pobox.com> writes: > You could I suppose though that would just be adding another hack on top of > existing questionable behavior.
Agreed. We should fix the original function so that it has the obvious, intented effect. Leaving the buggy function in place and adding another function with the proper behaviour sounds ridiculous. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
