>> You could I suppose though that would just be adding another hack on >> top of existing questionable behavior.
Antoine> Agreed. We should fix the original function so that it has the Antoine> obvious, intented effect. Leaving the buggy function in place Antoine> and adding another function with the proper behaviour sounds Antoine> ridiculous. If we add commonpath or commonpathprefix or pathprefix, or whatever, then find someplace to move the existing commonprefix function (maybe to the string module or as a class method of string objects?) then could we make a 2to3 fixer for this? Skip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com