>> You could I suppose though that would just be adding another hack on
    >> top of existing questionable behavior.

    Antoine> Agreed. We should fix the original function so that it has the
    Antoine> obvious, intented effect. Leaving the buggy function in place
    Antoine> and adding another function with the proper behaviour sounds
    Antoine> ridiculous.

If we add commonpath or commonpathprefix or pathprefix, or whatever, then
find someplace to move the existing commonprefix function (maybe to the
string module or as a class method of string objects?) then could we make a
2to3 fixer for this?

Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to