-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I was going to object on principle to Raymond's suggestion to rip
out the
operator module functions in Python 3.0.1.
I thought it was for 3.1?
Sorry, I probably misread Raymond's suggestion.
I have no objection to ripping
them out for 3.1.
If you really think we need a Python 3.1 soon, then I won't worry
about
trying to get a 3.0.1 out soon. 3.1 is Benjamin's baby :).
Depending on what Benjamin wants to do we could try for something like
a release by PyCon or at PyCon during the sprints. Actually the sprint
one is a rather nice idea if Benjamin is willing to spend sprint time
on it (and he is sticking around for the sprints) as I assume you,
Barry, will be there to be able to help in person and we can squash
last minute issues really quickly.
Yep, I'm planning on sticking around, so that's a great idea.
If OTOH we do intend to get a 3.0.1 out, say by the end of
February, then
please be careful to adhere to our guidelines for which version
various
changes can go in. For example, the operator methods needs to be
restored
to the 3.0 maintenance branch, and any other API changes added to
3.0 need
to be backed out and applied only to the python3 trunk.
If you have the time for it, Barry, I am +1 on an end of February
3.0.1 with a March/April 3.1 if that works for Benjamin.
Or at least a 3.1alpha/beta/whatever during Pycon. I'm sure I can
find the time to do a 3.0.1 before Pycon.
Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSX9mGXEjvBPtnXfVAQL5BgP+JXX43hbNlrjeV9YBFBbCB9SfnFlImTTx
ZHhilw12yH13Ha2RLbre+sWlBDQFdTeAJkjUWg2/iZ7Ti8g9eD7sp1KRRuLkbTx0
83h+ciTd9Fdp+sv4JRKfP609X0dlAfbrjjVU/NzXCHePXb++Tr2liHRtHwnr3DgL
kZNp1jOTG8Q=
=nVHs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
