-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 29, 2009, at 6:31 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
If we intend for 3.0 to be a 'beta release', or to weaken the 'no features in micro releases' rule, then fine; but we have to be *really clear about it*. Are we? (The 3.0 release page calls it production-ready.)
I think it sets bad precedence to downgrade our confidence in the release. Again, my position is that it's better to stick to the same development processes we've always used, fix the most egregious problems in 3.0.1 with no API changes, but spend most of our energy on a 3.1 release in 6 months.
Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSYHga3EjvBPtnXfVAQLQxQP+Ipu3J0Ogvj0kW4txTgu8SJ4Hr6q7ll7i uyASnNQdB0WV3My1VsymMb5VlIWJtuvwY4DxYR1fqLHOQY6CloFqmmIkeMpZKt/K qXqNI1OvyLfoqg6QqXI+A4UFnUwlv7bSFHqZUu8wVn4De/kQqVfFUgjxBCoNe0lj 0au4xGdjjYo= =qOne -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
