python-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Neil Schemenauer
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Antoine Pitrou
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Ronald Oussoren via Python-Dev
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Nick Coghlan
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Move the pythoncapi_compat project under the GitHub Python or PSF organization? Antoine Pitrou
• [Python-Dev] How to build cpython for x86_64 target on M1 Mac? jeff . pek
  • [Python-Dev] Re: How to build cpython for x86_64 target on M1 Mac? Ned Deily
  • [Python-Dev] Re: How to build cpython for x86_64 target on M1 Mac? Jeff Pek
• [Python-Dev] PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Rejection notice. Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Rejection notice. Shantanu Jain
  • [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 677 (Callable Type Syntax): Rejection notice. Gregory P. Smith
• [Python-Dev] Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Barney Gale
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Ethan Furman
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Barney Gale
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Barney Gale
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Ethan Furman
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Request for feedback: pathlib.AbstractPath prototype Barney Gale
• [Python-Dev] Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Erlend Aasland
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Antoine Pitrou
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply to PEP 670 -- Convert macros to functions in the Python C API Victor Stinner
• [Python-Dev] RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings Pradeep Kumar Srinivasan
  • [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings S Pradeep Kumar
  • [Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings Brett Cannon
• [Python-Dev] Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Mark Dickinson
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Christopher Barker
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Steven D'Aprano
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Steven D'Aprano
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Jim J. Jewett
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Jim J. Jewett
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Antoine Pitrou
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Steven D'Aprano
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Steven D'Aprano
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Should we require IEEE 754 floating-point for CPython? Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Jeremiah Vivian
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Inada Naoki
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Serhiy Storchaka
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 h . vetinari
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Inada Naoki
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Inada Naoki
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Antoine Pitrou
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Erlend Aasland
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 h . vetinari
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Barry
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Require a C compiler supporting C99 to build Python 3.11 Steve Dower
• [Python-Dev] Python-Dev] Replace debug runtime checks in release mode, with assertions in debug mode Matti Picus
• [Python-Dev] Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Guido van Rossum
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Guido van Rossum
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Antoine Pitrou
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Lele Gaifax
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Terry Reedy
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Serhiy Storchaka
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Replace debug runtime checks in release mode with assertions in debug mode Victor Stinner
• [Python-Dev] I want to contribute to Python. Ezekiel Adetoro
  • [Python-Dev] Re: I want to contribute to Python. MRAB
  • [Python-Dev] Re: I want to contribute to Python. Victor Stinner
• [Python-Dev] It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Dong-hee Na
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Damian Shaw
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Damian Shaw
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Damian Shaw
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Senthil Kumaran
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Christian Heimes
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Jelle Zijlstra
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Gregory P. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Edwin Zimmerman
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Stéfane Fermigier
  • [Python-Dev] Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Ethan Furman
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Christopher Barker
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] lincoln auster [they/them]
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Steve Holden
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Christopher Barker
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Toshio Kuratomi
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Nick Coghlan
  • [Python-Dev] Fwd: Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Sasha Kacanski
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Coyot Linden (Glenn Glazer)
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Christopher Barker
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Ronald Oussoren via Python-Dev
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Skip Montanaro
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Eric V. Smith
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Skip Montanaro
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Alex Waygood
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Damian Shaw
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Terry Reedy
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Toshio Kuratomi
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Skip Montanaro
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Jeremy Kloth
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Ronald Oussoren via Python-Dev
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] lincoln auster [they/them]
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Barney Gale
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Antoine Pitrou
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Barney Gale
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Baptiste Carvello
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Gyro Funch
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] lincoln auster [they/them]
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Damian Shaw
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Sebastian Rittau
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Dan Stromberg
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] MRAB
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] lincoln auster [they/them]
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Barry Warsaw
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Stephen J. Turnbull
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Skip Montanaro
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Petr Viktorin
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Are "Batteries Included" still a Good Thing? [was: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module] Skip Montanaro
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Steve Dower
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Marc-Andre Lemburg
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Christopher Barker
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Chris Angelico
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Paul Moore
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module sethmichaellarson
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Ethan Furman
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Jim J. Jewett
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module Jim J. Jewett
• [Python-Dev] [RELEASE] Python 3.11.0a5 is available Pablo Galindo Salgado
• [Python-Dev] PyPy on PySide6 is there: PyPy with a Gui Christian Tismer-Sperling
  • [Python-Dev] Re: PyPy on PySide6 is there: PyPy with a Gui Christopher Barker
  • [Python-Dev] Re: PyPy on PySide6 is there: PyPy with a Gui Christian Tismer-Sperling
  • [Python-Dev] Re: PyPy on PySide6 is there: PyPy with a Gui Guido van Rossum
• [Python-Dev] Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Eric Snow
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Eric Snow
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). dw-git
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Stefan Behnel
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Eric Snow
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Stefan Behnel
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Eric Snow
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Inada Naoki
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Victor Stinner
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Brett Cannon
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Sebastian Berg
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Eric Snow
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Guido van Rossum
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Eric Snow
  • [Python-Dev] Re: Moving away from _Py_IDENTIFIER(). Victor Stinner

• Earlier messages
• Later messages