Time to move to this to python-ideas, folks. On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Calvin Spealman <ironfro...@gmail.com> wrote: > All of this debate is moot without the foundation of a common library > on which we would be building these coroutines. Any proposal of a > specific coroutine syntax is worthless without a time and community > tested coroutine implementation, which would be subject to the same > rigerous inclusion requirements as any other 3rd party library. Only > then, some time in the future, would any argument about a specific > syntax be worth real consideration. > > Let's not jump the shark. > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> > wrote: >> Willem Broekema wrote: >> >>> Function g violates the current limitation that generators can't >>> return with a value. So can g only be used using "yield *" then, or >>> would that limitation be removed? >> >> The limitation would be removed, in the interests >> of making it easier to use generators as coroutines. >> >> -- >> Greg >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ironfroggy%40gmail.com >> > > > > -- > Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting! > http://techblog.ironfroggy.com/ > Follow me if you're into that sort of thing: http://www.twitter.com/ironfroggy > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
