gl...@divmod.com schrieb: > On 01:00 am, greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: >>Guido van Rossum wrote: >>>We already have yield expressions and they mean something else... >> >>They don't have a "*" in them, though, and I don't >>think the existing meaning of yield as an expression >>would carry over into the "yield *" variant, so there >>shouldn't be any conflict. >> >>But if you think there will be a conflict, or that the >>similarity would be too confusing, maybe the new >>construct should be called something else. I'm >>open to suggestions. > > I'm *already* regretting poking my head into this particular bike shed, > but... > > has anyone considered the syntax 'yield from iterable'? i.e.
Yes, basically the "yield *" and "yield from" are the two possibilities that come up every once in a while. Would that someone wrote a PEP, so that we can get a decision at some time. Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
